Can you go 15-0?

Spin conference and team across six roster slots, then project the playoff run.

6 rounds

Build the Saturday core.

Six position slots, any pre-2022 season (2006-2021). Spin for the conference and team, draft the best names you can find, then run the 15-game title path.

Loading CFBD stat profiles...

How scoring works

Great players matter most. Smart fits can push the roster higher.

The sim starts with the players you drafted, builds offense and defense ratings from those picks, then adds a small chemistry adjustment. Chemistry is not meant to beat raw talent, but it can reward rosters that make sense together.

1. Each pick gets a score

Game rating carries most of the weight. The stat profile gives productive players a bump, so a monster season can close some of the gap.

2. Units matter

QB and OL drive a lot of the offense. Front 7 drives more of the defense than the secondary. The final overall leans hardest on offense and defense.

3. Chemistry rewards fit

Same school, same era, and same conference group raise chemistry. Low chemistry can lower overall, but that penalty is capped at 3 points.

4. The season still has variance

Each game compares your roster to that week's difficulty. Better teams get better odds, but a perfect 15-0 run still takes some luck.

Under the hood

Player and roster scores

Player score = 78% rating + 22% stat profile

OFF = QB 32%, RB 18%, WR/TE 20%, OL 30%

DEF = Front 7 55%, DB 45%

OVR = OFF 44%, DEF 39%, talent 13%, plus chemistry

Chemistry score

Starts at 95

- 7 per extra conference group

- 6 per extra era

+ 3 per extra player in your biggest school stack

+ 0.25 x (average stat score - 82)

Game odds

88 chemistry is neutral for overall.

Each chemistry point moves overall by 0.25.

Win odds follow a curve on roster strength minus week difficulty.

Chemistry nudges that strength up or down a few points.

Independent fan project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the NCAA, EA Sports, any conference, school, or athlete.

Player statistics are historical public data from CollegeFootballData.com. Player ratings (Overall and stars) are fictional simulations and do not reflect any official ranking, evaluation, or endorsement.

Are you an athlete (or representative) who wants to be removed? Request removal.